In-home kit · Results in ~15 min
See suspected microplastic particles in your tap, filtered, or bottled water — without mailing a sample to a $600 lab. Stain, filter, look under the digital microscope. Glowing particles are counted as likely microplastics.
Kit: $100. Tests: $7 each. Kit with hard-shell case: $150. Shipping and applicable sales tax added at checkout. The kit includes zero tests.

A real customer result. Pink dots mark particles that took up the Nile Red stain — likely microplastics.
Three steps. About 15 minutes, start to finish.
01
Pour ~100 mL into a glass container and drop in the Nile Red vial. Wait 15 minutes minimum — longer is fine, and better. The dye binds preferentially to hydrophobic surfaces like plastic; minerals and salts don't take it up, though some organic matter can.
02
Push the whole sample through the syringe filter. Particles down to 1 µm are trapped on the disc face.
03
Look at the filter under the digital microscope. Pink dots are counted as likely microplastics — a screening count you take yourself. The included microscope sees particles down to about 5 µm.
Want the full protocol? Read the methodology — the peer-reviewed Nile Red method, packaged for home use.
| This kit | Mail-in lab | |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial terms | Available to order online; tests sold separately | $598–$835 per sample |
| Turnaround | ~15 minutes, on your table | 2–4 weeks mail-in |
| Where it happens | Your home, your hands | A lab you mail a sample to |
| What you get | The actual particles, in front of you | A PDF from a technician |
| Tests | Sold separately — one per sample | One per invoice |
Read the full comparison: in-home vs. lab microplastics testing
Curious whether your filter actually works? See what we've tested — filters and bottled-water brands, with real results.
Real filters from real samples. The pink particles took up the Nile Red stain and are counted as likely microplastics.

A real customer tap-water filter — dense pink particle load.

One-year-old SmartWater bottle. Hard to count individual dots.

Reference baseline. Distilled water through the full process: 0–3 particles.

Reusable kit hardware. Tests sold separately.
Same kit, four common use cases. Each guide walks through the specific samples worth running.
Cold morning tap, hot tap, kitchen vs bathroom. Find which sample in your house has the most.
Read the guideAquafina, Fiji, Dasani, your store-brand. Most of the plastic is from the bottle, not the source.
Read the guideBrita, PUR, ZeroWater, Berkey, reverse osmosis, fridge dispenser. Verify yours actually removes plastic.
Read the guideTrinity College Dublin 2020: 16.2 million particles per liter from polypropylene formula prep. Test your bottle.
Read the guideComparing to a lab? In-home vs lab microplastic testing — cost, speed, accuracy →
Honest comparisons against the labs, the DIY route, and the other kits people ask about.
Cost, speed, accuracy — when each is the right tool.
Mail-in lab vs in-home kit, side by side. Use both is the strongest play.
Honest rundown of every option — including ours, with the bias disclosed.
Real filter photos from real customers. No fabricated stars.
Baby bottles, formula, kid water bottles. Research-led, no fear-mongering.
The full step-by-step — supplies, timing, and how to read your filter.
Nile Red staining is the same method published in peer-reviewed microplastic research since 2017. The kit packages it for a kitchen counter.
It is a kit that lets you see suspected microplastic particles in a water sample yourself, without a lab. You stain 100 mL of water with Nile Red dye, push it through a syringe filter, and look at the filter under the included digital microscope. Particles that take up the stain fluoresce bright pink and are counted as likely microplastics. The reusable hardware and test refills are sold separately.
Current kit, test, and shipping prices appear on the order page. Conventional mail-in lab testing runs $598–$835 per single sample.
Yes. The kit uses Nile Red — the same fluorescent dye used in peer-reviewed microplastics research, including the 2017 Orb Media survey that found microplastics in 94% of US tap samples. It binds preferentially to hydrophobic surfaces like plastic, so stained particles glow bright pink; some organic matter can also fluoresce, so the count is a screening estimate, not a lab-confirmed identification. You look at the filter under the included digital microscope and count the particles yourself, live, in minutes.
There is no need for a local lab. The kit ships anywhere in the US, with postage sold separately, and you run the test yourself in about 15 minutes — no appointment, no technician, no sample to mail.
Nile Red staining is a peer-reviewed screening method used by labs worldwide. The kit gives a screening count of likely microplastics down to about 5 µm with the included microscope — useful for comparing samples, such as tap vs. filtered. Some organic matter can also fluoresce, and black plastics often don't take up the dye, so it is not a lab-confirmed identification. It does not identify the specific polymer — that requires py-GC/MS instrumentation. The kit itself has not yet been independently validated; spike-recovery testing and a lab comparison are planned (see /methodology and /limitations#validation).
Anything you can pour 100 mL of: tap water, bottled water, filtered water from a pitcher or reverse osmosis system, fridge-dispenser water, brewed tea or coffee, or prepared baby formula. One separately sold test is required per sample.
About 15 minutes. Pour ~100 mL into a glass container, drop in the Nile Red vial and wait 15 minutes minimum (longer is fine, and better), then 1–2 minutes to push the sample through the filter and look at it under the digital microscope. The pink particles are visible as soon as the filter is under the microscope. No mailing, no waiting for a technician, no PDF.
No. The kit's 25mm syringe filter has a 1 micron pore size, so it captures particles down to 1 µm; the included digital microscope sees particles down to about 5 µm, which is the kit's practical detection limit as shipped (a more powerful microscope can see down to the filter's ~1 µm capture size). Nanoplastics — particles smaller than 1 µm — require a lab: electron microscopy, stimulated Raman scattering, or py-GC/MS. The kit screens the visible-by-fluorescence microplastic load, which is the size class implicated in the 2017 Orb Media tap-water findings. Nanoplastics still matter — they're the fraction small enough to cross into blood, brain, and placenta, and a Columbia 2024 study found bottled water held ~240,000 particles per liter, about 90% of them nano. Your microplastic count is the visible proxy for that larger invisible load. See our nanoplastics explainer at /nanoplastics.
Yes — it's the best way to use the kit. Run one test on your tap water (input) and one on your filter's output. The delta is how much your filter actually removes. That takes two refills, which are sold separately from the kit. See the filter teardowns at /tested and the per-filter pages: Brita, PUR, ZeroWater, Berkey, reverse osmosis.
No. Polymer identification requires py-GC/MS — pyrolysis gas chromatography mass spectrometry — which is a five-figure instrument. The kit answers "how many likely microplastic particles are in this sample" and "how does this sample compare to another." For most people, that's the question.
There are products on Amazon that test for hardness, chlorine, lead, or pH using paper strips — none of those are microplastic tests. As of 2026, no consumer microplastic test kit using the Nile Red fluorescent staining method ships from Amazon. The Water Test ships direct from the manufacturer.
TapScore and similar mail-in labs run a much wider analysis — heavy metals, PFAS, hardness, sometimes microplastics — with results in 2–4 weeks. The in-home kit is microplastics-only, with separately sold tests and results you see yourself in 15 minutes. For a one-time deep dive on water quality use a lab. For ongoing visibility on plastic load, the in-home kit is the right tool.
Same kit, every source. Here's the version of the question that matches yours.